Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Foster Hsu, LLP	Family Law Attorneys  Motto
  • We Speak English & Mandarin
  • ~

Back to School: The Role of Educational Decisions in Custody Agreements

ReassuringChild

When parents divorce or separate, one of the most critical aspects of custody agreements is determining how educational decisions will be made for their children. Educational decisions encompass a broad range of choices, from selecting a school to addressing special education needs or deciding on tutoring. At Foster Hsu, LLP in San Jose, California, we take these decisions and your child’s academic success seriously.

Who Has the Authority to Make Educational Decisions?

In a custody agreement, decision-making authority regarding a child’s education typically falls under the broader category of legal custody. Legal custody refers to the right to make important decisions about a child’s life, including education, health care, and religious upbringing. In many cases, parents may share joint legal custody, meaning both have equal say in making these significant decisions. However, there are situations where one parent may have sole legal custody, granting them the exclusive right to make educational decisions.

When joint legal custody is in place, it is crucial for parents to communicate effectively and collaborate on educational decisions. Disagreements can arise over various issues, such as choosing between public and private schools, enrolling a child in special education programs, or deciding whether a child needs additional tutoring. To prevent conflict and ensure that decisions are made in the child’s best interest, custody agreements should outline a clear process for resolving disputes, such as mediation or involving a third-party expert.

Choosing Schools

One of the most contentious educational decisions in custody agreements is selecting a school. The choice of school can affect a child’s academic performance, social development, and even their future opportunities. Parents may have differing opinions on the best educational environment for their child, whether it’s a public, private, or charter school.

When drafting a custody agreement, it is essential to consider how school choice decisions will be made. For example, the agreement might specify that both parents must agree on the school selection, or it might give one parent the final decision-making authority if an agreement cannot be reached. In some cases, the agreement may include provisions for a specific school district or school type, particularly if the child is already enrolled and thriving in a particular school.

Addressing Special Education Needs

Children with special education needs require additional considerations in a custody agreement. These needs may include individualized education programs (IEPs), specialized instruction, or accommodations in the classroom. Decisions about special education services can be complex and may involve coordination with school administrators, teachers, and outside specialists.

Custody agreements should explicitly address how decisions related to special education will be made and who will be responsible for attending meetings, advocating for the child’s needs, and ensuring that the IEP or 504 Plan is followed. Both parents should be involved in these decisions, as they have a profound impact on the child’s educational success.

Seek Legal Assistance Today

Educational decisions are among the most important aspects of a child’s life and should be carefully considered in any custody agreement. At Foster Hsu, LLP, our San Jose Child Custody Lawyers understand the complexities of custody agreements and are here to help you navigate these decisions with your child’s best interests in mind.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation